Re: pg_amcheck contrib application - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: pg_amcheck contrib application
Date
Msg-id CAH2-WzmRyajOPrtWk_BoN47fozdqy-o9FK=Sz+3gzF_Mr=cT=Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_amcheck contrib application  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:53 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> One of the advantages of this design is that we verify practically all
> of the work involved in deleting an entire subtree up-front, inside
> _bt_lock_subtree_parent(). It's clearly safe to back out of it if it
> looks dicey.

That's taken care of. I just pushed a commit that teaches
_bt_lock_subtree_parent() to press on.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: multi-install PostgresNode
Next
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend