On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 2:02 AM Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
> I think revert+release is not really a good idea until we understand how this commit breaks things.
> Chances are that it only affects frequency of the reproduction.
+1 -- it's been in a stable release for months now, and we will
probably know the exact nature of the problem in just a few more days.
There is no reason to decide that the feature needs to be reverted
before anything else. Or if there is I would like to hear it.
--
Peter Geoghegan
