On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 6:32 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> But it's *not* a hard rule --- we explicitly rejected mechanisms
> that would make it so (such as a precommit hook). I view "koel
> is unhappy" as something that you ought to clean up, but if you
> don't get to it for a day or three there's not much harm done.
It's hard to square that with what you said about needing greater peer
pressure on committers.
> Right now I think we just need to raise
> committers' awareness of this enough that they routinely run
> pgindent on the files they're touching. In the problem cases
> so far, they very clearly didn't. I don't see much point in
> worrying about second-order problems until that first-order
> problem is tamped down.
Realistically, if you're the committer that broke koel, you are at
least the subject of mild disapproval -- you have likely
inconvenienced others. I always try to avoid that -- it pretty much
rounds up to "hard rule" in my thinking. Babysitting koel really does
seem like it could cut into my dinner plans or what have you.
--
Peter Geoghegan
