Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum?
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wz=gkPvzf+H6nXtcxT2STGvh7-hmys4X-oGsihddZQte1Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum?  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 10:18 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > I'm pretty sure that some people believe that wraparound can cause
> > actual data corruption
>
> Well, historically they're not wrong.

True, but the most recent version where that's actually possible is
PostgreSQL 8.0, which was released in early 2005. That was a very
different time for the project. I don't think that people believe that
wraparound can cause data corruption because they remember a time when
it really could. It seems like general confusion to me (which could
have been avoided).

At a minimum, we ought to be very clear on the fact that Postgres
isn't going to just let your database become corrupt in some more or
less predictable way. The xidStopLimit thing is pretty bad, but it's
still much better than that.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: initdb / bootstrap design
Next
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow root ownership of client certificate key