On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 1:28 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 10:18 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > > I'm pretty sure that some people believe that wraparound can cause
> > > actual data corruption
> >
> > Well, historically they're not wrong.
>
> True, but the most recent version where that's actually possible is
> PostgreSQL 8.0, which was released in early 2005. That was a very
> different time for the project. I don't think that people believe that
> wraparound can cause data corruption because they remember a time when
> it really could. It seems like general confusion to me (which could
> have been avoided).
No, I think it's PostgreSQL 13, because before the vacuum failsafe
thing you could end up truncating enough tables during vacuum
operations to actually wrap around.
And even in 14+, you can still do that, if you use single user mode.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
