On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 8:55 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Um ... you seem to have removed some useful comments?
I don't think that the stuff about making them into a GUC is useful myself.
> Personally I wouldn't do this, as I don't think the renaming
> brings much benefit, and it will create a hazard for back-patching
> any fixes that might be needed in that code. I'm not hugely upset
> about it, but that's the way I'd vote if asked.
In that case I withdraw the patch.
FWIW I wrote the patch during the course of work on new feature
development. A patch that added a couple of similar constants a bit
further down. Seemed neater this way, but it's certainly not worth
arguing over.
--
Peter Geoghegan
