Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date
Msg-id CAFBsxsGFUpMFM950JJx=YeSxM6oCk27R5NM2v-VhQmVK_mSWjw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
List pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 9:24 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> FWIW, I think the best path forward would be to do something similar to the
> simplehash.h approach, so it can be customized to the specific user.

I figured that would come up at some point. It may be worth doing in the future, but I think it's way too much to ask for the first use case.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Rename some rel truncation related constants at the top of vacuumlazy.c
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name