Re: Two identical systems, radically different performance - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Claudio Freire
Subject Re: Two identical systems, radically different performance
Date
Msg-id CAGTBQpbt6sFkbGqELBzesTuz=v=iY3NQPdf+_AppfN7KNzkJEQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Two identical systems, radically different performance  (Andrea Suisani <sickpig@opinioni.net>)
Responses Re: Two identical systems, radically different performance  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
Re: Two identical systems, radically different performance  (Andrea Suisani <sickpig@opinioni.net>)
List pgsql-performance
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Andrea Suisani <sickpig@opinioni.net> wrote:
>> It does prove they're not equivalent though.
>>
>
> sure you're right.
>
> It's just that my bet was on a higher throughput
> when HT was isabled from the BIOS (as you stated
> previously in this thread).

Yes, mine too. It's bizarre. If I were you, I'd look into it more
deeply. It may be a flaw in your test methodology (maybe you disabled
the wrong cores?). If not, it would be good to know why the extra TPS
to replicate elsewhere.


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Andrea Suisani
Date:
Subject: Re: Two identical systems, radically different performance
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Two identical systems, radically different performance