On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Some looking around says that this *isn't* the only place that just >> blithely assumes that it will find an opfamily entry. But I agree >> that not checking for that isn't up to project standards.
> I go thorough the get_opfamily_proc() in the system and added the > check for InvalidOid.
Think I did that already, please compare your results with 278cb4341103e967189997985b09981a73e23a34