Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Some looking around says that this *isn't* the only place that just
>> blithely assumes that it will find an opfamily entry. But I agree
>> that not checking for that isn't up to project standards.
> I go thorough the get_opfamily_proc() in the system and added the
> check for InvalidOid.
Think I did that already, please compare your results with
278cb4341103e967189997985b09981a73e23a34
regards, tom lane