Re: pg_upgrade and wraparound - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alexander Shutyaev
Subject Re: pg_upgrade and wraparound
Date
Msg-id CAGBp8g8oQz+iwjeXunQaKrAekjmDbxPXLffjTRsSWmwFgJ=2=Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade and wraparound  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade and wraparound
List pgsql-general
No database with oid 0 in 9.6 cluster:

postgres=# select oid, datname from pg_database;
    oid     |  datname
------------+-----------
          1 | template1
      12438 | template0
      16400 | bof
      12439 | postgres
 1016305714 | sslentry
(5 rows)

>> 1) OS and version you are using?

Ubuntu 16.04.4

>> 2) Where are you getting you Postgres from?:
>>  a) Package
>>          Repo?
>>  b) Source
>>          File source?

I've installed it from postgresql repo -  http://apt.postgresql.org/pub/repos/apt/

>> 3) Where there any issues with 9.6 cluster before you tried to upgrade from it?

No, I don't remember anything specific about it.

2018-06-10 23:55 GMT+03:00 Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>:
On 06/10/2018 01:46 PM, Alexander Shutyaev wrote:
I can provide you with more info. Please tell me what you need. I really hope
someone here can help me somehow solve or workaround this, because I really
need to migrate to v10 for its features.

Well as Tom Lane said a database will not have an OID of 0, so we need to know where that is coming from. On the oft chance it occurred in your 9.6 cluster can you see if:

select oid, datname from pg_database;

in the 9.6 cluster shows an OID of 0.

Also:

1) OS and version you are using?

2) Where are you getting you Postgres from?:
a) Package
        Repo?
b) Source
        File source?

3) Where there any issues with 9.6 cluster before you tried to upgrade from it?



Thanks in advance,
Alexander



--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-general-f1843780.html




--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and wraparound
Next
From: Alexander Shutyaev
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and wraparound