Re: Reasons for postgres processes beeing killed by SIGNAL 9? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Clemens Eisserer
Subject Re: Reasons for postgres processes beeing killed by SIGNAL 9?
Date
Msg-id CAFvQSYR-q_nKoCEF=X52LJdcWKuksFe3qqnLSbfiHyhoRnsfwQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Reasons for postgres processes beeing killed by SIGNAL 9?  (Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Reasons for postgres processes beeing killed by SIGNAL 9?
List pgsql-general
Hi again,

We are still constantly getting postgresql processes killed by signal
9 from time to time, without any idea why or how.
Syslog seems completly clean.

In case a postgresql process would exceed some restricted resources
like file descriptors, would the kernel choose to terminate it using
SIGKILL? Are there any other common examples / occurences where
processes are terminated this way automatically?

Thank you in advance, Clemens

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: timestamps, formatting, and internals
Next
From: c k
Date:
Subject: suggestion for backup