Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm forpartition-wise join - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm forpartition-wise join
Date
Msg-id CAFjFpRctst136uN2BvbWLAkS7w278XmKY4_PUB+xk-+NezNq8g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm forpartition-wise join  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm forpartition-wise join  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Hi Ashutosh.
>
> On 2018/02/07 13:51, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>> Here's a new patchset with following changes
>>
>> 1. Rebased on the latest head taking care of partition bound
>> comparison function changes
>
> I was about to make these changes myself while revising the fast pruning
> patch.  Instead, I decided to take a look at your patch and try to use it
> in my tree.
>
> I looked at the patch 0001 and noticed that git diff --check says:
>
> src/backend/catalog/partition.c:2900: trailing whitespace.
> +partition_rbound_datum_cmp(FmgrInfo *partsupfunc, Oid *partcollation,

Thanks. Fixed.

>
> Also, might be a good idea to write briefly about the new arguments in the
> header comment.  Something like that they are PartitionKey elements.

Here's updated patch set with those comments added.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN fast default
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm forpartition-wise join