Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

9 February 2018

• 00:01   Re: Proposal: partition pruning by secondary attributes Andres Freund
• 00:02   Re: it's a feature, but it feels like a bug Rafal Pietrak
• 01:31   Re: update tuple routing and triggers Robert Haas
• 01:32   Re: postgres_fdw: perform UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING on a join directly Robert Haas
• 01:40   Re: Fix a typo in walsender.c Robert Haas
• 02:26   Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v10.0 Thomas Munro
• 05:39   Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem Alvaro Herrera
• 06:17   Re: update tuple routing and triggers Amit Langote
• 06:26   Re: Fix a typo in walsender.c atorikoshi
• 06:44   Re: PostgreSQL 2018-02-08 Security Update Release Tatsuo Ishii
• 07:10   Re: PostgreSQL 2018-02-08 Security Update Release Stephen Frost
• 07:13   Re: PostgreSQL 2018-02-08 Security Update Release Tatsuo Ishii
• 07:23   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Peter Geoghegan
• 07:48   Re: postgres_fdw: perform UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING on a join directly Etsuro Fujita
• 09:05   ldapi support Peter Eisentraut
• 09:44   Creation of wiki page for open items of v11 Michael Paquier
• 09:56   Re: ldapi support Thomas Munro
• 10:36   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Vacuum: Update FSM more frequently Masahiko Sawada
• 11:09   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning Ashutosh Bapat
• 11:24   Re: ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN fast default Andrew Dunstan
• 11:27   Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm forpartition-wise join Ashutosh Bapat
• 11:31   Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm forpartition-wise join Ashutosh Bapat
• 11:32   Re: non-bulk inserts and tuple routing Amit Langote
• 11:56   Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm forpartition-wise join Amit Langote
• 12:03   Re: Proposal: partition pruning by secondary attributes Ashutosh Bapat
• 12:05   Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm forpartition-wise join Ashutosh Bapat
• 12:07   Re: Creation of wiki page for open items of v11 Ashutosh Bapat
• 12:56   Re: CALL stmt, ERROR: unrecognized node type: 113 bug Michael Paquier
• 13:11   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning Amit Langote
• 13:28   Using scalar function as set-returning: bug or feature? Konstantin Knizhnik
• 13:34   Re: Temporary tables prevent autovacuum, leading to XID wraparound Masahiko Sawada
• 13:47   Re: Using scalar function as set-returning: bug or feature? Sergei Kornilov
• 13:56   Is there a cache consistent interface to tables ? Garym
• 14:02   Re: Using scalar function as set-returning: bug or feature? Konstantin Knizhnik
• 14:06   Parallel bt build crashes when DSM_NONE Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 14:08   Server won't start with fallback setting by initdb. Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 14:16   Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 14:55   Re: [HACKERS] FOSDEM PGDay_2018_Developer_Meeting notes Pantelis Theodosiou
• 14:58   Re: Using scalar function as set-returning: bug or feature? Konstantin Knizhnik
• 15:19   Re: Using scalar function as set-returning: bug or feature? Konstantin Knizhnik
• 15:24   Re: [HACKERS] FOSDEM PGDay_2018_Developer_Meeting notes Dave Page
• 15:25   Re: [HACKERS] FOSDEM PGDay_2018_Developer_Meeting notes Michael Paquier
• 16:24   Re: postgres_fdw: perform UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING on a join directly Etsuro Fujita
• 16:26   Re: non-bulk inserts and tuple routing Etsuro Fujita
• 17:02   Re: Using scalar function as set-returning: bug or feature? Marko Tiikkaja
• 17:02   Re: CALL stmt, ERROR: unrecognized node type: 113 bug Pavel Stehule
• 17:10   Re: Using scalar function as set-returning: bug or feature? Pavel Stehule
• 17:49   Re: Proposal: partition pruning by secondary attributes Ildar Musin
• 18:20   Re: non-bulk inserts and tuple routing Etsuro Fujita
• 18:20   Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem Claudio Freire
• 18:34   Wait event names mismatch: oldserxid Ashutosh Bapat
• 18:36   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning Amit Langote
• 18:42   Re: Proposal: partition pruning by secondary attributes Alvaro Herrera
• 18:53   Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: enabling parallel execution for cursorsexplicitly (experimental) Amit Kapila
• 18:55   Re: [HACKERS] FOSDEM PGDay_2018_Developer_Meeting notes Stephen Frost
• 18:58   Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions Nikhil Sontakke
• 19:23   Re: CALL stmt, ERROR: unrecognized node type: 113 bug Michael Paquier
• 19:27   Re: [HACKERS] FOSDEM PGDay_2018_Developer_Meeting notes Michael Paquier
• 19:32   Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem Alvaro Herrera
• 19:53   Re: Wait event names mismatch: oldserxid Michael Paquier
• 19:57   Re: [HACKERS] FOSDEM PGDay_2018_Developer_Meeting notes Tomas Vondra
• 20:02   Re: Is there a cache consistent interface to tables ? David G. Johnston
• 20:03   Re: Wait event names mismatch: oldserxid Ashutosh Bapat
• 20:15   Re: CALL stmt, ERROR: unrecognized node type: 113 bug David G. Johnston
• 20:26   Re: CALL stmt, ERROR: unrecognized node type: 113 bug Pavel Stehule
• 20:36   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Robert Haas
• 20:40   Re: Is there a cache consistent interface to tables ? Craig Ringer
• 20:42   Re: CALL stmt, ERROR: unrecognized node type: 113 bug Tom Lane
• 20:46   Re: CALL stmt, ERROR: unrecognized node type: 113 bug David G. Johnston
• 20:48   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Vacuum: Update FSM more frequently Claudio Freire
• 21:10   Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 Merlin Moncure
• 21:28   Re: Built-in connection pooling Konstantin Knizhnik
• 21:31   Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp(). Dmitry Dolgov
• 22:05   Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem Claudio Freire
• 22:30   Re: CALL stmt, ERROR: unrecognized node type: 113 bug Andres Freund
• 22:50   Re: postgres_fdw: perform UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING on a join directly Robert Haas