Re: CALL stmt, ERROR: unrecognized node type: 113 bug - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: CALL stmt, ERROR: unrecognized node type: 113 bug
Date
Msg-id 20180209065650.GA24787@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CALL stmt, ERROR: unrecognized node type: 113 bug  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: CALL stmt, ERROR: unrecognized node type: 113 bug  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 04:07:28PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> You need to read that as "only a SubPlan can be executed after a SubLink
> has been processed by the planner", so please replace the last "latter"
> by "planner".

(I forgot to add Peter and Andrew in CC: previously, so done now.)

e4128ee7 is making is clear that SubLink are authorized when
transforming it in transformSubLink(), however I cannot think about a
use case so should we just forbid them, and this is actually untested.
So the patch attached does so.

The second problem involves a cache lookup failure for a type when
trying to use pg_get_functiondef on a procedure.  Luckily, it is
possible to make the difference between a procedure and a function by
checking if prorettype is InvalidOid or not.  There is room for a new
patch which supports pg_get_proceduredef() to generate the definition of
a procedure, with perhaps a dedicated psql shortcut, but that could
always be done later on.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: Creation of wiki page for open items of v11
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning