ne 9. 4. 2023 v 3:54 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> napsal:
Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> writes: > I'm not sure if the *prompt* is a sensible place for it though. The > place it seems like it would be most useful is reading the output of > script executions where there would be no prompts. Perhaps it's the > command tags and \echo statements that should be timestamped.
Hmm, that is an interesting idea. I kind of like it, not least because it eliminates most of the tension between wanting a complete timestamp and wanting a short prompt. Command tags are short enough that there's plenty of room.
I don't agree so there is a common request for a short prompt. Usually I use four terminals on screen, and still my terminal has a width of 124 characters (and I use relatively small display of my Lenovo T520). Last years I use prompt like:
