On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 4:53 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: > It is, but sometime the polymorphic types can help. > > The proposed feature/syntax has sense primary for polymorphic types. It > should to follow our polymorphic types. The primary pair is > "anyarray","anyelement" -> "arraytype","elemementtype". > > If you don't use polymorphic parameters in plpgsql, then proposed feature > can look like useless.
I don't think it's useless, but I do think the syntax is ugly. Maybe it's the best we can do and we should just live with it, but Alvaro asked for opinions, so there's mine.
ok
5 years ago, maybe more - I proposed more nice syntax - and it was rejected as too complex (reserved worlds was required). So this solution try to attack it from different side. It is simple and effective.
