On 3/7/19 12:41 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > > čt 7. 3. 2019 v 18:35 odesílatel Andrew Dunstan > <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com > <mailto:andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>> napsal: > > > > > The other thing that bugs me a bit about the patch is that the only > testing it does it to make sure that pragmas are ignored by the core > plpgsql processor. Maybe that's enough, but mostly we tend to like to > have one actual use of a feature. > > > Unfortunately plpgsql_check is not part of upstream > > https://github.com/okbob/plpgsql_check > > I can to write some simple extension - some print tracing, that can > use this feature? > >
Works for me. Another idea I had was some sort of crypto signature pragma.
I still think making it block level only is unwarranted, though.
for me it is better than nothing, and it is good - it is not bad compromise. It can be enhanced in future, when there will be good case. I didn't propose any syntax, feature, that block future full implementation compatible with Ada and PL/SQL.
Pavel
cheers
andrew
-- Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
