Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobyhKgHDfw2Rc6jbkMB6uep3PxfLHtqx82g4exM+=jg6Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 12:49 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2019-03-07 08:52:21 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 6:11 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > > slot that's compatible with the "target" table. You can get compatible
> > > slot callbakcs by calling table_slot_callbacks(), or directly create one
> > > by calling table_gimmegimmeslot() (likely to be renamed :)).
> >
> > Hmm.  I assume the issue is that table_createslot() was already taken
> > for another purpose, so then when you needed another callback you went
> > with table_givemeslot(), and then when you needed a third API to do
> > something in the same area the best thing available was
> > table_gimmeslot(), which meant that the fourth API could only be
> > table_gimmegimmeslot().
> >
> > Does that sound about right?
>
> It was 3 AM, and I thought it was hilarious...

It is.  Just like me.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Online verification of checksums