Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRDRbGcpQ6sWaSrybzT_Ay7C7izX3fNUzRu-0Jy52rf3Qw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
List pgsql-hackers


2017-01-11 20:56 GMT+01:00 Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>:

I think we need to focus on things that _can't_ be done first, rather
than things that require porting, e.g. until we had savepoints, you
couldn't migrate an application that needed it.  It wasn't a question of
porting --- there was just no way to port it.

Those _missing_ pieces should be a priority.

Nested/autonomous transactions? Do they occur often in PL/SQL code?

There is relative well working workaround - ora2pg is able to translate it to dblink usage.

Sure - native solution can be better - usage pg_background is step forward.

Regards

Pavel
 

--
Fabien.



--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again
Next
From: Ashutosh Sharma
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pageinspect: Hash index support