Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fabien COELHO
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again
Date
Msg-id alpine.DEB.2.20.1701112055060.11499@lancre
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Packages: Again  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> I think we need to focus on things that _can't_ be done first, rather
> than things that require porting, e.g. until we had savepoints, you
> couldn't migrate an application that needed it.  It wasn't a question of
> porting --- there was just no way to port it.
>
> Those _missing_ pieces should be a priority.

Nested/autonomous transactions? Do they occur often in PL/SQL code?

-- 
Fabien.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again