> Okay, I think one more point to consider is that it would be preferable to > have such an option for backend sessions and not for other processes > like WalSender.
All right...I see the usage.. I withdraw my objection to 'session' prefix then now that I understand the case. So, do you agree that:
*) session_idle_timeout: dumps the backend after X time in 'idle' state and *) transaction_timeout: cancels transaction after X time, regardless of state
sounds good?
Not too much
*) transaction_timeout: cancels transaction after X time, regardless of state
This is next level of statement_timeout. I can't to image sense. What is a issue solved by this property?
