Re: Detection of nested function calls - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: Detection of nested function calls
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRC9vfSq-DE2i0aUuMBrpp_HxoVXBa-eEQXMPdsPYbc=Mg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Detection of nested function calls  (Hugo Mercier <hugo.mercier@oslandia.com>)
List pgsql-hackers



2013/10/25 Hugo Mercier <hugo.mercier@oslandia.com>
Le 25/10/2013 14:29, Pavel Stehule a écrit :
> Hello
>
>
> 2013/10/25 Hugo Mercier <hugo.mercier@oslandia.com
> <mailto:hugo.mercier@oslandia.com>>.
>
>     I am quite new to postgresql hacking, so I'm sure there is room for
>     improvements. But, what about this first proposal ?
>
>
> I am not sure, if this solution is enough - what will be done if I store
> some values in PL/pgSQL variables?
>

You mean if you store the result of a (nested) function evaluation in a
PL/pgSQL variable ?
Then no nesting will be detected by the parser and in this case the user
function must ensure its result is serialized, since it could be stored
(in a variable or a table) at any time.

ok

I remember, so I though about similar optimization when I worked on SQL/XML implementation - so same optimization can be used there.

Regards

Pavel

 

--
Hugo Mercier
Oslandia


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hugo Mercier
Date:
Subject: Re: Detection of nested function calls
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: CLUSTER FREEZE