> > * I'm concerned that the proposed syntax is not future-proof. > > Can be > > DROP DATABASE '(' options ...) [IF EXISTS] name > > ok?
Seems weird to me. I'd rather have the options at the end with a WITH keyword. But that's just me, looking at gram.y for other productions involving ^DROP.
> I don't think so server side implementation is too helpful - there is lot > of situations, where DDL command is much more practical.
I tend to agree. Not really a fan of the double-timeout business, though.
So when are you submitting an updated patch, addressing the other items that Tom mentions in his review?
