On 2019-Jul-25, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> čt 25. 7. 2019 v 5:11 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> napsal:
>
> > Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> > * I'm concerned that the proposed syntax is not future-proof.
>
> Can be
>
> DROP DATABASE '(' options ...) [IF EXISTS] name
>
> ok?
Seems weird to me. I'd rather have the options at the end with a WITH
keyword. But that's just me, looking at gram.y for other productions
involving ^DROP.
> I don't think so server side implementation is too helpful - there is lot
> of situations, where DDL command is much more practical.
I tend to agree. Not really a fan of the double-timeout business,
though.
So when are you submitting an updated patch, addressing the other items
that Tom mentions in his review?
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
