Re: plpgsql - DECLARE - cannot to use %TYPE or %ROWTYPE for composite types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: plpgsql - DECLARE - cannot to use %TYPE or %ROWTYPE for composite types
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRB+ECM4hOhLD1ze-13uW=D9fhVi2ao5KLPvT_tYRU_ttg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: plpgsql - DECLARE - cannot to use %TYPE or %ROWTYPE for composite types  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: plpgsql - DECLARE - cannot to use %TYPE or %ROWTYPE for composite types
List pgsql-hackers


2016-03-16 16:50 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>:


2016-03-16 16:46 GMT+01:00 Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>:
On 03/15/2016 05:17 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> In short, I think we should reject this implementation and instead try
> to implement the type operators we want in the core grammar's Typename
> production, from which plpgsql will pick it up automatically.  That is
> going to require some other syntax than this.  As I said, I'm not
> particularly pushing the function-like syntax I wrote upthread; but
> I want to see something that is capable of supporting all those features
> and can be extended later if we think of other type operators we want.

+1

Anyone want to argue against changing the status of this to Rejected or
at least Returned with feedback?

I would to reduce this patch to fix row type issue. There is not any disagreement. I'll send reduced patch today.

Any other functionality is not 9.6 topic.

I played with the reduced patch, and the benefit without all other things is negligible. It should be rejected.

Regards

Pavel
 

Regards

Pavel


Joe

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dmitry Ivanov
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Phrase search ported to 9.6
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: Choosing parallel_degree