On 08/29/2013 02:22 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > Still I don't think so correct solution is enabling a unbound SELECTs, but > correct is a fix a PERFORM and remove a necessity to use a PERFORM for call > of VOID functions.
You have yet to supply any arguments which support this position.
Several people have pointed out that requiring PERFORM needlessly makes life hard for PL/pgSQL programmers, especially new ones. You have not given us any benefit it supplies in return.
And no, I don't accept the idea that we might someday have some kind of conflicting syntax for stored procedures which nobody is working on as a valid argument.
The more stronger argument is not allow a useless execution.
PL/pgSQL is a verbose language and it is based on very strict ADA language - a few a secure mechanism we dropped (and some from good reasons).
So questions is - how much we would to go against a ADA ideas and PL/SQL rules.
No think so PERFORM is a significant problem. A mayor problem for beginners is usually a fact, so PL/pgSQL is ALGOL like languages - and they don't know with these languages. Second problem is missing a more dynamic data structures. Next a really different syntax and usage of OUT variables, ...
