Re: converting datum to numeric - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: converting datum to numeric
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRAJjQOiZjRwL-5dB5h9E2Ede3bqmNPFn3YWjCMaMQxCNQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to converting datum to numeric  (Szymon Guz <mabewlun@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: converting datum to numeric
List pgsql-hackers
Hello

2013/6/25 Szymon Guz <mabewlun@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
> I've got a couple of questions.
>
> I was using numeric_out like this:
>
> DatumGetCString(DirectFunctionCall1(numeric_out, d));
>
> Why do I have to use DirectFunctionCall1 instead of calling numeric_out?

numeric_out functions doesn't use C calling convention - it use own
convention for support NULL values and some other informations.
DirectFunctionCall1 is simple function that transform C like call to
PostgreSQL call. You can do it directly, but you have to prepare
necessary structures.

>
>
> I was suggested to use numeric_send instead of numeric_out, however when
> changing the function names in the above example, the whole expression
> returns 8. Always 8. I check with:
>
> char *x = DatumGetCString(DirectFunctionCall1(numeric_send, d));
> PLy_elog(NOTICE, x).
>

"send" functions are used for binary protocol - so it is nonsense.

>
> And my main question: is there any documentation about those internal
> functions, which use and when etc?

source code :( and http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/xfunc-c.html

src/backend/utils/atd/* is very useful and contains lot of materials for study

some examples of usage you can find in contrib examples

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/extend.html

Regards

Pavel

>
> thanks
> Szymon



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem building in a directory shared from Mac to Ubuntu
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem building in a directory shared from Mac to Ubuntu