Re: batch fdw insert bug (Postgres 14) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: batch fdw insert bug (Postgres 14)
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRAAKc1XQq+Cb2frxeaxwsxAfoJEVxYLc6Wyig0VZDF-3w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: batch fdw insert bug (Postgres 14)  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


pá 7. 5. 2021 v 22:43 odesílatel Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> napsal:

On 5/7/21 2:46 PM, houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com wrote:
>
>>   I am testing new features in Postgres 14, and I found bug
>> EXPLAIN ANALYZE VERBOSE  for insert to FDW table with batch_size 1000 returns
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>   Insert on public.vzdalena_tabulka2  (cost=0.00..175.00 rows=0 width=0) (actual time=30.269..30.270 rows=0 loops=1)
>>     Remote SQL: \x7F\x7F\x7F\x7F\x7F\x7F\x7F\x7F\x7F\x7F\x7F\x7F\x7F\x7F\x7F\x7F\x7F\x7F\x7F\x7F\x7F\x7F\x7F\x7F\x7F\x7F\x7F\x7F
>>     Batch Size: 1000
>>     ->  Function Scan on pg_catalog.generate_series g  (cost=0.00..175.00 rows=10000 width=36) (actual time=0.453..1.988 rows=10
>>           Output: g.i, ('AHOJ'::text || (g.i)::text)
>>           Function Call: generate_series(1, 10000)
>>   Planning Time: 0.075 ms
>>   Execution Time: 31.032 ms
>> (8 rows)
>> reproducer
>
> I can reproduce the issue and did some basic analysis on it.
>
> The "Remote SQL" is built from the following code:
>
> ----------------
>               char       *sql = strVal(list_nth(fdw_private,
>                                                                                 FdwModifyPrivateUpdateSql));
>
>               ExplainPropertyText("Remote SQL", sql, es);
> ---------------
>
> It use the query string stored in list fdw_private.
> However, the "fmstate->query" will also point to the string in fdw_private,
> by  postgresBeginForeignModify --> create_foreign_modify --> "fmstate->query = query;"
>
> And in execute_foreign_modify(), " fmstate->query "  will be freed when rebuild the query
> string to do the batch insert like the following:
>
> ----------------
> if (operation == CMD_INSERT && fmstate->num_slots != *numSlots)
> {
> ...
>          /* Build INSERT string with numSlots records in its VALUES clause. */
>          initStringInfo(&sql);
>          rebuildInsertSql(&sql, fmstate->orig_query, fmstate->values_end,
>                                           fmstate->p_nums, *numSlots - 1)
> **      pfree(fmstate->query);
>          fmstate->query = sql.data;
> ----------------
>
> So, it output the freed pointer as "Remote SQL".
>
> For the fix.
> The query string could be rebuilt depending on the numSlots,
> which query string should be output ?
> should we just output the original query string like the attached patch ?
> Or should we output the last one?
>

Yeah. The problem is we build fdw_private list once (which references
the SQL string), and during execution we may pfree() it. But then
EXPLAIN ANALYZE gets the same fdw_private list and tries to use the SQL
string which we pfreed() already.

I think the simplest fix is simply to pstrdup() the query when building
fmstate in create_foreign_modify. We've already been doing that for
orig_query anyway. That seems cleaner than printing the last query we
build (which would be confusing I think).

I've pushed a fix doing that. We only need that for INSERT queries, and
we might even restrict that to cases with batching if needed.

Great

Thank you

Pavel



regards

--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: batch fdw insert bug (Postgres 14)
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: plan with result cache is very slow when work_mem is not enough