Re: timestamp - timestamp result - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: timestamp - timestamp result
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRA2SbOjviqpcbaRNZPnTfU3EuvPnQAZk+fj0iuuhOCPgA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to timestamp - timestamp result  (Thomas Kellerer <shammat@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: timestamp - timestamp result
List pgsql-general


pá 26. 6. 2020 v 7:29 odesílatel Thomas Kellerer <shammat@gmx.net> napsal:
I regularly see people suggesting to use

    extract(day from one_timestamp - other_timestamp)

to calculate the difference between two timestamps in days.

But I wonder if the "format" of the resulting interval is guaranteed to only have days
(and not months or years)

The following:

     timestamp '2020-06-26 17:00:00' - timestamp '2019-04-01 14:00:00'

returns an interval like this:

     0 years 0 mons 452 days 3 hours 0 mins 0.0 secs

However, is there ever a chance that the expression will yield the (equivalent) interval:

     1 years 2 mons 25 days 3 hours 0 mins 0.0 secs

postgres=# select age(timestamp '2020-06-26 17:00:00',timestamp '2019-04-01 14:00:00');
┌────────────────────────────────┐
│              age               │
╞════════════════════════════════╡
│ 1 year 2 mons 25 days 03:00:00 │
└────────────────────────────────┘
(1 row)
 

e.g. as the age() function does.

Is it safe to assume that "timestamp - timestamp" will never contain units larger then days?

Now, this operator internally calls only interval_justify_hours functions. So if somebody doesn't change related code, you can expect so only days, hours field's are changed.

Regards

Pavel


 


Thomas



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Kellerer
Date:
Subject: timestamp - timestamp result
Next
From: Ishan Joshi
Date:
Subject: RE: Postgres server 12.2 crash with process exited abnormally andpossibly corrupted shared memory