Re: [HACKERS] Bug in ExecModifyTable function and trigger issues forforeign tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dilip Kumar
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Bug in ExecModifyTable function and trigger issues forforeign tables
Date
Msg-id CAFiTN-vx1pYKbtkFdX9srL+dghCJdZ9-DgRb57oDs5GuCDCD2Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Bug in ExecModifyTable function and trigger issues forforeign tables  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Bug in ExecModifyTable function and trigger issues forforeign tables
Re: [HACKERS] Bug in ExecModifyTable function and trigger issuesfor foreign tables
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 9:54 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> After your fix, now tupleid is invalid which is expected, but seems
> like we need to do something more. As per the comments seems like it
> is expected to get the oldtuple from planSlot.  But I don't see any
> code for handling that part.

Maybe we should do something like attached patch.

-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Typos in pg_basebackup.c
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bug with pg_basebackup and 'shared' tablespace