Re: Is Recovery actually paused? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dilip Kumar
Subject Re: Is Recovery actually paused?
Date
Msg-id CAFiTN-vwNKammUbs9TGQxv8t6ZXNGnQVg9Z-0GDzhF=O_yX9RA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is Recovery actually paused?  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Is Recovery actually paused?  (Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 12:50 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 2:00 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 6:10 AM Bharath Rupireddy
> > <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > +1 to just show the recovery pause state in the output of
> > > pg_is_wal_replay_paused. But, should the function name
> > > "pg_is_wal_replay_paused" be something like
> > > "pg_get_wal_replay_pause_state" or some other? To me, when "is" exists
> > > in a function, I expect a boolean output. Others may have better
> > > thoughts.
> >
> > Maybe we should leave the existing function pg_is_wal_replay_paused()
> > alone and add a new one with the name you suggest that returns text.
> > That would create less burden for tool authors.
>
> +1
>

Yeah, we can do that, I will send an updated patch soon.

-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Keisuke Kuroda
Date:
Subject: Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks
Next
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: Support ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... ADD/DROP PUBLICATION ... syntax