Re: Opportunistically pruning page before update - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dilip Kumar
Subject Re: Opportunistically pruning page before update
Date
Msg-id CAFiTN-vu+U2HfUPr5u=GhoZvCDDGOZWWZ2g63SMH1+TLC2s=gg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Opportunistically pruning page before update  (James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Opportunistically pruning page before update
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 7:18 AM James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 8:21 PM James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > See rebased patch attached.
>
> I just realized I left a change in during the rebase that wasn't necessary.
>
> v4 attached.

I have noticed that you are performing the opportunistic pruning after
we decided that the updated tuple can not fit in the current page and
then we are performing the pruning on the new target page.  Why don't
we first perform the pruning on the existing page of the tuple itself?
 Or this is already being done before this patch? I could not find
such existing pruning so got this question because such pruning can
convert many non-hot updates to the HOT update right?

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Multiple startup messages over the same connection
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum