Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 12:58 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 5:18 PM John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 2:24 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > For the next version patch, I'll work on this idea and try to clean up
> > > locking stuff both in tidstore and radix tree. Or if you're already
> > > working on some of them, please let me know. I'll review it.
> >
> > Okay go ahead, sounds good. I plan to look at the tests since they
> > haven't been looked at in a while.
>
> I've attached the latest patch set. Here are updates from v54 patch:
>
> 0005 - Expose radix tree lock functions and remove all locks taken
> internally in radixtree.h.
> 0008 - Remove tidstore's control object.
> 0009 - Add tidstore lock functions.
> 0011 - Add VacDeadItemsInfo to store "max_bytes" and "num_items"
> separate from TidStore. Also make lazy vacuum and parallel vacuum use
> it.

John pointed out offlist the tarball includes only the patches up to
0009. I've attached the correct one.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com