On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 12:01 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 8:51 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Agreed. I've attached the updated patch.
> > >
> > > Thank you for testing, Dilip!
> >
> > Thanks! One hunk is failing on the latest head. And, I have rebased
> > the patch for my testing so posting the same. I have done some more
> > testing to test multi-pass vacuum.
> >
>
> The patch looks good to me. I have done a few minor modifications (a)
> moved the declaration of variable closer to where it is used, (b)
> changed a comment, (c) ran pgindent. I have also done some additional
> testing with more number of indexes and found that vacuum and parallel
> vacuum used the same number of total_read_blks and that is what is
> expected here.
>
> Let me know what you think of the attached?
The patch looks fine to me.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
