On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 8:51 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Agreed. I've attached the updated patch.
> >
> > Thank you for testing, Dilip!
>
> Thanks! One hunk is failing on the latest head. And, I have rebased
> the patch for my testing so posting the same. I have done some more
> testing to test multi-pass vacuum.
>
The patch looks good to me. I have done a few minor modifications (a)
moved the declaration of variable closer to where it is used, (b)
changed a comment, (c) ran pgindent. I have also done some additional
testing with more number of indexes and found that vacuum and parallel
vacuum used the same number of total_read_blks and that is what is
expected here.
Let me know what you think of the attached?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
