Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dilip Kumar
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
Date
Msg-id CAFiTN-uxvOUhykiR7Mwpez4fvhnX3gTmtr2ttEXbdEXu7=e6Pg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> Test2:
> postgres=# insert into x2 values(100);   -- it should violates
> partition constraint
> INSERT 0 1
>
> Seems like a bug or am I missing something completely?

Sorry, my bad. It's modulus on the hashvalue, not the column.


-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Create publication syntax is not coming properly in pg_dump / pg_dumpall