Re: Remove unused variable from SharedSort - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dilip Kumar
Subject Re: Remove unused variable from SharedSort
Date
Msg-id CAFiTN-uj=5hFh=f98RWL0gQSoz=zR2f9CVM=dPd0ZzcFWsfkqQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Remove unused variable from SharedSort  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Remove unused variable from SharedSort  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 12:50 PM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 5:29 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > While going through the code I noticed that the nTapes member in
> > SharedSort is unused.  This is just initialized with nworkers but
> > never used.  The attached patch removes this variable.
> >
>
> We could have used that variable for an assert like
> Assert(state->worker <= shared->nTapes) in worker_freeze_result_tape()
> before accessing shared->tapes[state->worker] = output; as sometimes
> state->worker is being set to -1. But, it seems like we reach
> worker_freeze_result_tape(), only when  WORKER(state) is true. So, we
> don't need that extra Assert and removing nTapes variable makes sense
> to me.

Right, but anyway IMHO adding extra shared memory variables for just
and assert purposes doesn't make sense.

> Patch looks good to me. Regression tests make check and make
> check-world ran successfully.

Thanks for looking into this.

-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Li Japin
Date:
Subject: Re: Terminate the idle sessions
Next
From: Erik Rijkers
Date:
Subject: Re: Supporting = operator in gin/gist_trgm_ops