Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Move pg_attribute.attcompression to earlier in struct for reduced size? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dilip Kumar
Subject Re: Move pg_attribute.attcompression to earlier in struct for reduced size?
Date
Msg-id CAFiTN-uh752J_VL+DnjddBbf8LDqEjZR2iw9tAdUieSXnHLT9A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Move pg_attribute.attcompression to earlier in struct for reduced size?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 12:02 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:24:36AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > If you switch attcompression, I'd say to go for the others while on
> > it.  It would not be the first time in history there is a catalog
> > version bump between betas.
>
> This is still an open item.  FWIW, I can get behind the reordering
> proposed by Tom for the consistency gained with pg_type, leading to
> the attached to reduce the size of FormData_pg_attribute from 116b to
> 112b.

This makes sense, thanks for working on this.

-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: Forget close an open relation in ReorderBufferProcessTXN()
Next
From: "osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: Forget close an open relation in ReorderBufferProcessTXN()