Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Move pg_attribute.attcompression to earlier in struct for reduced size? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Move pg_attribute.attcompression to earlier in struct for reduced size?
Date
Msg-id YKdT5ZM5OInCsDkM@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Move pg_attribute.attcompression to earlier in struct for reduced size?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Move pg_attribute.attcompression to earlier in struct for reduced size?
Re: Move pg_attribute.attcompression to earlier in struct for reduced size?
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:24:36AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> If you switch attcompression, I'd say to go for the others while on
> it.  It would not be the first time in history there is a catalog
> version bump between betas.

This is still an open item.  FWIW, I can get behind the reordering
proposed by Tom for the consistency gained with pg_type, leading to
the attached to reduce the size of FormData_pg_attribute from 116b to
112b.
--
Michael
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Diagnostic comment in LogicalIncreaseXminForSlot
Next
From: "tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: Bug in query rewriter - hasModifyingCTE not getting set