Re: Questions/Observations related to Gist vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dilip Kumar
Subject Re: Questions/Observations related to Gist vacuum
Date
Msg-id CAFiTN-uVc-avPfBBjkcz_FpaJXRSpN3fzUqGj3fR4DLmZxidvA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Questions/Observations related to Gist vacuum  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
Responses Re: Questions/Observations related to Gist vacuum
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 7:22 PM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
>
> On 16 October 2019 12:57:03 CEST, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 7:13 PM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
> >wrote:
> >> All things
> >> considered, I'm not sure which is better.
> >
> >Yeah, this is a tough call to make, but if we can allow it to delete
> >the pages in bulkdelete conditionally for parallel vacuum workers,
> >then it would be better.
>
> Yeah, if it's needed for parallel vacuum, maybe that tips the scale.

Are we planning to do this only if it is called from parallel vacuum
workers or in general?

-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: Questions/Observations related to Gist vacuum
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: SegFault on 9.6.14