Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : Parallel Merge Join - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dilip Kumar
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : Parallel Merge Join
Date
Msg-id CAFiTN-uS2k-_ebuU9WDrLVFKf-FKqUF5QdVRqQtjnjf5nmC4QQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : Parallel Merge Join  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : Parallel Merge Join  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think for now we can keep the parallel safety check for cheapest
> inner path, though it will be of use only for the very first time we
> compare the paths in that loop.  I am not sure if there is any other
> better way to handle the same.

Done that way.


-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : Parallel Merge Join
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres