On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think for now we can keep the parallel safety check for cheapest
>> inner path, though it will be of use only for the very first time we
>> compare the paths in that loop. I am not sure if there is any other
>> better way to handle the same.
>
> Done that way.
>
Thanks, your patch looks good to me.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
