Re: Support logical replication of DDLs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dilip Kumar
Subject Re: Support logical replication of DDLs
Date
Msg-id CAFiTN-tWkJW-JEGANkK+O3KXUjv_Yb5Tb+r83ujbognHG_brTA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support logical replication of DDLs  (Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Support logical replication of DDLs  (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 7:00 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com> wrote:
>

I was going through 0001 patch and I have a few comments/suggestions.

1.

@@ -6001,7 +6001,7 @@ getObjectIdentityParts(const ObjectAddress *object,
                 transformType = format_type_be_qualified(transform->trftype);
                 transformLang = get_language_name(transform->trflang, false);

-                appendStringInfo(&buffer, "for %s on language %s",
+                appendStringInfo(&buffer, "for %s language %s",
                                  transformType,
                                  transformLang);


How is this change related to this patch?

2.
+typedef struct ObjTree
+{
+    slist_head    params;
+    int            numParams;
+    StringInfo    fmtinfo;
+    bool        present;
+} ObjTree;
+
+typedef struct ObjElem
+{
+    char       *name;
+    ObjType        objtype;
+
+    union
+    {
+        bool        boolean;
+        char       *string;
+        int64        integer;
+        float8        flt;
+        ObjTree       *object;
+        List       *array;
+    } value;
+    slist_node    node;
+} ObjElem;

It would be good to explain these structure members from readability pov.

3.

+
+bool verbose = true;
+

I do not understand the usage of such global variables.  Even if it is
required, add some comments to explain the purpose of it.


4.
+/*
+ * Given a CollectedCommand, return a JSON representation of it.
+ *
+ * The command is expanded fully, so that there are no ambiguities even in the
+ * face of search_path changes.
+ */
+Datum
+ddl_deparse_to_json(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
+{

It will be nice to have a test case for this utility function.

-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: test_decoding assertion failure for the loss of top-sub transaction relationship