On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 2:39 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 2:43 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:15 AM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Thanks for checking. There has been a lot of churn in the inheritance
> > > planning code since my last email on this thread, so I'd like to
> > > reconsider. I'm busy this week with some things, so I'll try posting
> > > something on next Tuesday.
> > >
> > Sounds good.
>
> I looked at this today and concluded that the problem and the patches
> discussed here are fairly isolated from inheritance planning changes
> committed to PG 12.
>
> I've combined the two patches into one.
Looks fine to me, moved to ready for committer.
I tried to think up test
> cases to go with the code changes, but couldn't come up with one.
I am also not sure how to test whether we have access to the
statistics of the table.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
