Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: CVE-2017-7484-induced bugs, or, btree cmp functions are not leakproof? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: CVE-2017-7484-induced bugs, or, btree cmp functions are not leakproof?
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqHaqLDEF=X+b2zznSzkjBX4dsiER4QciEFjNh51Ls5irA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CVE-2017-7484-induced bugs, or, btree cmp functions are not leakproof?  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: CVE-2017-7484-induced bugs, or, btree cmp functions are not leakproof?
Re: CVE-2017-7484-induced bugs, or, btree cmp functions are not leakproof?
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 2:43 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:15 AM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks for checking.  There has been a lot of churn in the inheritance
> > planning code since my last email on this thread, so I'd like to
> > reconsider.  I'm busy this week with some things, so I'll try posting
> > something on next Tuesday.
> >
> Sounds good.

I looked at this today and concluded that the problem and the patches
discussed here are fairly isolated from inheritance planning changes
committed to PG 12.

I've combined the two patches into one.  I tried to think up test
cases to go with the code changes, but couldn't come up with one.

Thanks,
Amit
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Daniel Westermann (DWE)"
Date:
Subject: Re: Fw: Documentation fix for adding a column with a default value
Next
From: Surafel Temesgen
Date:
Subject: Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option