Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dilip Kumar
Subject Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics
Date
Msg-id CAFiTN-t6oeBVd2=zsxURZ65UJcxOaDRRc=RxLZDFyPGCWJ+oMw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view

On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:

OK, I will test it, sometime in this week.

I have tested this patch in my laptop, and there i did not see any regression at 1 client

Shared buffer 10GB, 5 mins run with pgbench, read-only test

            base    patch
run1    22187   24334
run2    26288   27440
run3    26306   27411


May be in a day or 2 I will test it in the same machine where I reported the regression, and if regression is there I will check the instruction using Call grind.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex