On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 5:11 PM Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> V2 works. Thanks for fixing this quickly, I think you can add a
>> comment for the new error condition you added.
>
> Added comments. PFA v3
Thanks.
+ *
+ * For indexes with INCLUDEd columns we do not know whether we can reduce
+ * index tuple size by suffixing its key part or we will go into the
+ * endless loop on pick-split (in case included columns data is big enough
INCLUDEd -> why you have used a mixed case here?
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
