Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dilip Kumar
Subject Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Date
Msg-id CAFiTN-sV3pTt731LtWaweCoww=2DQF=hc7pHbtyJgCR-vzaBDQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 9:13 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-03-23 18:49:11 +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> > I think directly using smgrcreate() is a better idea instead of first
> > registering and then unregistering it.   I have made that change in
> > the attached patch.  After this change now we can merge creating the
> > MAIN_FORKNUM also in the loop below where we are creating other
> > fork[1] with one extra condition but I think current code is in more
> > sync with the other code where we are doing the similar things so I
> > have not merged it in the loop.  Please let me know if you think
> > otherwise.
>
> FWIW, this fails tests: https://cirrus-ci.com/build/4929662173315072
> https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6651773434724352?logs=test_bin#L121
> https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6088823481303040?logs=test_world#L2377

Strange to see that these changes are making a failure in the
file_copy strategy[1] because we made changes only related to the
wal_log strategy.  However I will look into this.  Thanks.
[1]
Failed test 'createdb -T foobar2 foobar5 -S file_copy exit code 0'


-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding CI to our tree
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: cpluspluscheck vs ICU