Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Date
Msg-id 20220323154317.bhi2nrqkoe6xaczl@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2022-03-23 18:49:11 +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> I think directly using smgrcreate() is a better idea instead of first
> registering and then unregistering it.   I have made that change in
> the attached patch.  After this change now we can merge creating the
> MAIN_FORKNUM also in the loop below where we are creating other
> fork[1] with one extra condition but I think current code is in more
> sync with the other code where we are doing the similar things so I
> have not merged it in the loop.  Please let me know if you think
> otherwise.

FWIW, this fails tests: https://cirrus-ci.com/build/4929662173315072
https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6651773434724352?logs=test_bin#L121
https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6088823481303040?logs=test_world#L2377

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: clean up test_rls_hooks module